By
James Smith, 11 April 2012
Somalia 's
Islamist militia, al Shabaab, is on the back foot. Each week brings news of
another town seized. The forceful departure of al Shabaab however does not
necessarily imply victory for the inhabitants of the 'newly liberated areas'.
analysis
Ethiopian troops have played a crucial role in liberating parts of Somalia
from Al Shabaab, but their time there will be limited.
In late 2011
Ethiopian forces together with pro-government Somali militias captured
Beledweyne, not far from the Ethiopian border. Eight weeks later Baidoa, a strategically important city in the south, fell
to Ethiopian troops and pro-government militias. In late March Ethiopia overran El Bur, one of the group's main
bases in central Somalia .
Kismayo, on the southern coast, is now the last major city held by al Shabaab.
The mission to
remove al Shabaab's black flag from Somalia 's urban centres throughout
the south-central region is advancing more rapidly than many thought possible. But
ridding a town of one militia is just the beginning. Filling the power vacuum
left behind by al Shabaab unearths a new set of problems underscored by one key
factor - a willing, capable and legitimate alternative remains elusive.
It comes as no
surprise that Ethiopian forces are making the greatest headway in south-central
Somalia .
The Ethiopian military is well trained, well equipped and
one of the largest on the continent. It has more experience in Somalia than
all other forces currently fighting put together. Ethiopia however has made clear
that it does not intend to hang around. Nor, if it did, would it be welcome.
The African Union
Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) is developing plans to replace troops in Ethiopian
held towns throughout south-central Somalia . Baidoa is now host to
the first contingent of AMISOM troops outside of Mogadishu . 2,500 troops will be deployed in
phases to strengthen and later replace Ethiopian forces. Another contingent
is expected to arrive in Beledweyne in the coming weeks.
It has taken
AMISOM four years to build a fragile trust with Mogadishu 's residents. Outside of the
capital, winning the 'hearts and minds' of a population who are understandably
dubious of (if not openly hostile towards) external interventions will be a
challenge for troops from Uganda ,
Burundi , Kenya and Djibouti .
How local
residents in Baidoa and Beledweyne receive them will provide some indication of
the extent of the challenges that lie ahead. According to @HSMPress, Al Shabaab
intends to "employ every available avenue in the fulfillment of its
objectives." Those thought to be siding with or facilitating the
"African invaders" and the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) are
also considered legitimate targets. Open support of AMISOM during this
uncertain phase of expansion presents a formidable risk to local populations.
Even if welcomed,
AMISOM's capacity to secure the 'newly liberated areas' is questionable.
Despite Kenya 's
recent integration into the mission and new commitments made at the London
Conference, AMISOM is overstretched. Despite al Shabaab's 'tactical
withdrawal' from Mogadishu
in mid-2011, 12,000 AMISOM troops supported by the TFG's own forces still
struggle to secure the city. Last week's suicide bombing at the newly
re-opened National Theatre serves as a reminder that al Shabaab is still able
to penetrate supposedly safe areas of the city with devastating consequences.
UN Security
Council Resolution 2036 (2012) requested the African Union
increase AMISOM's force strength to a maximum of 17,731 uniformed personnel. This
leaves less than half the force strength currently unable to secure Mogadishu to defend the
south-central towns and cities from al Shabaab. Even if successful, foreign
troops holding towns surrounded by vast tracts of ungoverned land is not a
durable solution. The legitimacy and capability of whoever eventually governs
and administers the 'newly liberated areas' will determine whether they can
break free from the cycle of instability and violence that has characterised
the last two decades.
The TFG Prime
Minister Abdiwali Mohamed Ali has announced that his government intends to
create regional administrations for all 'newly liberated areas'. Already the
appointment of new regional administrators has become another source of
contestation. Following the capture of Beledweyne, the TFG officially declared
a new administration in the Hiraan region and appointed Abdifatah Hassan Afrah,
President of the Shabelle Valley Administration (SVA), as TFG provisional
regional chairman. By doing so, the TFG publicly snubbed the moderate Sufi
group Ahlu Sunna Wal Jamaa (ASWJ) who, alongside the Ethiopians and SVA,
captured Beledweyne from al Shabaab.
Fighting has
since broken out between ASWJ and SVA in Beledweyne. Human Rights Watch has
accused both ASWJ and SVA of summary executions of civilians in the town,
naming SVA militias as the worst offenders. Unsurprisingly the TFG has denied
the claims. Al Shabaab has been able to take advantage of hostility between
ostensibly 'allied' forces within the town with a series of low-level attacks
targeting military bases.
The TFG's mandate
expires in August, terminating its official engagement with 'newly liberated
areas' sooner than AMISOM's. How Mogadishu
engages with the local administrations and how they in turn engage with local
residents in post-TFG Somalia
will at least partly determine what comes next.
However, in light
of the uncertainty surrounding the political structure of Somalia after
August, competition for authority is set to intensify in the coming months.
Leadership battles, both local and national, may well receive greater attention
among the political elite than the establishment of a viable constitution.
Ousting al
Shabaab from towns throughout south-central Somalia is widely perceived as a
major step forward for the country. Optimism abounds that this will prove to be
a defining moment. Without a lasting political solution however the Ethiopian
and 'allied' forces' take-over of towns throughout the country is just the
latest in a seemingly endless series of occupations.
James Smith is
the Horn of Africa Project Manager for the Rift Valley Institute in Nairobi . The views in
this article are his own, and do not represent a collective position on the
part of the Institute.
No comments:
Post a Comment