Sunday 1 April 2012

United Kingdom - Fuel poverty



·         Households are considered by the Government to be in 'fuel poverty' if they would have to spend more than 10% of their household income on fuel to keep their home in a 'satisfactory' condition.  It is thus a measure which compares income with what the fuel costs 'should be' rather than what they actually are.  Whether a household is in fuel poverty or not is determined by the interaction of a number of factors, but the three obvious ones are:

o    The cost of energy.

o    The energy efficiency of the property (and therefore, the energy required to heat and power the home)

o    Household income.



·         All the points below relate to England only.

·          

·         4.0 million households in England were classified as being in fuel poverty in 2009 (18% of all households).  This is three time the number of households that were in fuel poverty at the low point in 2003, and there have been increases in each year since 2003.  It is, however, still lower than the number in the mid-1990s.

·          

·         Fuel poverty is most common among those live in private rented accommodation: averaging from 2007 to 2009, 20% of households in private rented accommodation were in fuel poverty compared to around 15% in other tenures.

·          

·         Despite their much lower average incomes, those in social rented accommodation are only a bit more likely to be in fuel poverty than owner-occupiers.  This is partly because very little social housing is energy inefficient (see the indicator on energy efficiency) and partly because social housing tends to be small, both factors meaning that relatively little fuel is required to keep the home warm.

·          

·         Analysis of the relationship between fuel poverty and household income depends in part on whether the household incomes are analysed before or after deducting housing costs. 1  A further complication is that the relationship changes when levels of fuel poverty change substantially, as they have done in the last few years.  In this context, the focus of the points below is on the the qualitative patterns rather than the quantitative proportions.  Furthermore, in keeping with the approach used throughout this website, all the quantitative points relate to households grouped according to their incomes after, rather than before, deducting housing costs.

·          

·         The risk of fuel poverty rises sharply as household income falls and, for example, very few households with above-average incomes are in fuel poverty: averaging across 2007 to 2009, around two-fifths of households in the poorest fifth after deducting housing costs were in fuel poverty.  Even so, a majority of households in the poorest fifth were not in fuel poverty and, furthermore, there were a substantial number of households who are not in the poorest fifth but who are nevertheless in fuel poverty (around half of the total number in fuel poverty).  Clearly, therefore, there are factors other than household income which affect whether a household is in fuel poverty or not.

·          

·         One such factor is how energy efficient the home is.  For example, households not in the poorest fifth but in very energy inefficient homes are actually more likely to be in fuel poverty than households in the poorest fifth but in homes with above-average energy efficiency.  More specifically, averaging across 2007 to 2009, around two-fifths of households not in the poorest fifth after deducting housing costs but living in homes with a SAP rating (see the indicator on energy efficiency for a definition) of less than 30 were in fuel poverty compared with around a third of households in the poorest fifth but living in homes with a SAP rating of 50 or above.  One result of this is that households who are both in the poorest fifth and in very energy inefficient homes are at a very high risk of fuel poverty (85%, averaging across 2007 to 2009).

·          

·         A second such factor is the composition of the household.  Single-person households - working-age singles as well as single pensioners - are more likely to be in fuel poverty than either couples or larger families.  Overall, averaging across 2007 to 2009, around 35% of single pensioners and 25% of working-age singles were in fuel poverty compared to around 20% of lone parents (the next highest group), 15% of pensioner couples, and 5% of working-age couples.  Because of their relatively high risk, half of all the households in fuel poverty in England are single-person households even though only a quarter of all households are single-person households.

·         Among those in low income, single-person households are also more likely to be in fuel poverty than either couples or larger families and this applies particularly to working-age singles (rates for pensioner singles are a bit lower).  The analysis in Cold and poor: an analysis of the link between fuel poverty and low income suggests that the reason for the high risk of fuel poverty among single-person households, both overall and among those in low income, is that, whereas their estimated fuel costs tend to be a bit lower than those for other household types, their household incomes tends to be a lot lower.  In other words, fuel costs tend to be a bigger burden, relative to incomes, for single-person households than for larger households.

·          

·         Finally, households in rural areas are more likely to be in fuel poverty than those in urban areas (averaging across 2007 to 2009, 20% in rural compared with 15% in urban), with similar proportional differences those in low income (for the poorest fifth, averaging across 2007 to 2009, 40% in rural compared with 40% in urban)

·          

·         The analysis above suggests that two of the major groups of concern from a fuel poverty perspective relate to those in low income who are either single-person households of working age and or who live in rural areas.  This is notable because these two groups have not been the focus of government's more general anti-poverty strategy, which has tended to focus on children, older people and deprived urban areas.

·          

·         Within England, fuel poverty is most prevalent in West Midlands and the North East.

No comments:

Post a Comment